Our latest: Martha's domestic hypocrisy
The Latino face of America

Dangers of limiting free speech
Social security debate gets taxing
Dangers of limiting free speech

Sexual behavior a lifestyle choice

GOP elites wrong on immigration

Students vs. Professors

Hot links:  Abort 73


Save up to 80% on home gym at Overstock.com! 120x60logo


Click here to 
bookmark us!

Complete Election Results
President

Governors

U.S. Senate

U.S. Congress

Ballot Initiatives

Join Our E-mail List

  

 

Banner 10000004

 


Pirates of Liberty

By Dorothy Anne Seese

 

Political USA Political Columnists
Kirsten Andersen

James Antle

Paul Conroy
Jeff Crouere

Joe Giardiello

Mario Giardiello

Scott Gillette

Dr. Marc Goldman

Marc Levin

Rachel Marsden

Tom McClintock
Dorothy Seese
Debbie Schlussel

Hans Zeiger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Democrats in Disarray following Bush Carrier Speech

By Bobby Eberle
[email protected]

Get Updates

Rather than keeping quiet in response to the overwhelmingly positive marks given by Americans to President Bush's speech aboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, the Democrats continue to amaze by once again saying the wrong things at the wrong times. Whether it's Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle blasting Bush at the beginning of the war with Iraq or countless Democrat congressmen echoing the media's assessment that the U.S. military was bogged down after a week and a half of action, the Democrat protests have been met with scorn, and yet they keep going. One has to wonder if the Democrats have truly gone off the deep end. It's one thing to complain about a controversial issue, but it's quite another to raise questions about actions which the public wholeheartedly supports.

President Bush's speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln resulted in the ultimate highlight reel: Bush landing on the carrier in full flight suit, being embraced and cheered by the military personnel, and speaking with a picture-perfect background of sky, ocean, and sailors. Yet, last week, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) called for an accounting of the cost of President Bush's speech on the USS Abraham Lincoln. In addition, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) took to the Senate floor blasting the same speech.

Sen. Byrd called the President's speech on the Abraham Lincoln an "affront to the Americans killed or injured in Iraq." Byrd went on to say that the aircraft carrier was used as "an advertising backdrop for a presidential political slogan."

"I believe that our military forces deserve to be treated with respect and dignity, and not used as stage props to embellish a presidential speech," Byrd added.

On the same day, Rep. Waxman sent a letter to the General Accounting Office calling for an investigation of the costs involved in the President's visit to the Abraham Lincoln. In the letter, Waxman claims that the Bush Administration provided "conflicting accounts" of the reasons for the "dramatic" visit to the aircraft carrier by jet.

Waxman states in the letter that since the carrier was closer to shore than originally reported, President Bush could have traveled to it "less theatrically." Waxman closes the letter by calling for a full accounting of costs associated with the trip since it was "paid for by American taxpayers" and had "clear political overtones."

Clear political overtones? If these Democrats knew anything about politics, they would let this story go. Every time a Democrat complains about Bush's speech, the footage of his carrier landing and "Top Gun" demeanor are replayed for an audience who already loved it the first time.

Waxman also implies that traveling to the carrier via helicopter would have been somehow more appropriate for the commander-in-chief. Waxman claims he is concerned about costs, yet by suggesting that a helicopter would have been better reveals that Waxman didn't even know that the operating costs of the appropriate helicopter (H-60) and the jet used (S-3B Viking) are virtually identical.

Responding to questions about Sen. Byrd's comments, White House Spokesman Ari Fleischer said that the President was "proud of the way he did it and he's proud he did it."

"I think it does a disservice to the men and women of our military to suggest that the President of the United States, or the manner in which the President visited the military would be anything other than the exact appropriate thing to do. And I think that the 5,000 sailors on that ship recognize this for what it was -- the President going out there to say thank you to those who risked their lives," Fleischer added.

Responding to Rep. Waxman's letter to the GAO, Fleischer said, "There's not a Republican that Congressman Waxman doesn't want to investigate, and so I just dismiss that as not serious."

If the Democrats have a strategy, it seems to have been crafted by Karl Rove rather than James Carville. The more they open their mouths, the more they help the Republicans. A senior Republican official told me last week that he hopes the Democrats will "continue down this path." He added that their actions "will backfire on them." I agree. Hopefully, the Democrats will keep talking all the way to the next election.

Bobby Eberle is President and CEO of GOPUSA (www.GOPUSA.com), a news, information, and commentary company based in Houston, TX. He holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Rice University.

Home | PUSA Columnists | Talking Heads | Links | Submit | Contact

Copyright Political USA, Inc., 1999-2005. Unauthorized use of materials is prohibited. If you want something, just ask us!