Click here for press availability

 



 

 


The Naked Truth with
Kirsten Andersen

[email protected]

 

 


     

 

 

Take the Traitor Tour

Your guide, Barbara Lee

 

Subscribe now to Zogby's 
"American Voices of Unity."

 

 


 

Search the Web's most comprehensive Political Directory:
Submit a site

 

 


Get your comments on TV

 



Kirsten Andersen
Brent Barksdale
Jeff Brewer

The Cynic
Joe Giardiello

Mario Giardiello

Scott Gillette
Tom McClintock
Ramesh Ponnuru
Dorothy Seese
Debbie Schlussel

Dr. Jack Wheeler


 

Does Abortion Cause Breast Cancer?  Why it Doesn't Matter....

by Kirsten Andersen
[email protected]

2/8/2002

 
Get Updates

Join Kirsten's Fan Club

Thanks in no small part to a group called the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, or "ABC," it has recently become in vogue throughout the pro-life movement to tout the results of various studies linking abortion to breast cancer.  The results of these studies are presented as if they were not only gospel truth, but also the most effective way to prevent any woman from ever considering an abortion. 

Unfortunately, the studies are not definitive by any stretch.  The disparities between the results of the 37 known studies linking breast cancer and abortion are great. They range from results that are statistically insignificant to an alleged 160% increase in breast cancer risk based on abortion (though the most commonly quoted of the studies indicates a 4% increase in risk).  Additionally, many of them make no distinction between induced abortion and spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage.

The abortion/breast cancer activists have a noble, albeit thinly veiled goal -- to end abortion altogether.  Their only problem, at least scientifically speaking, is that they started with the conclusion they wanted and worked their way back to a theory.  In other words, they needed a scare tactic and went about the business of finding one to suit their target audience -- women.

People say that all is fair in love and war.  Well, I love human life and I believe abortion is war against the most innocent of human life.  But I do not believe it is fair to the pro-life movement, or to the women being given these statistics, to attempt to balance the entire abortion argument on this one point.

The truth is, even a 4% increase in breast cancer risk from induced abortion is inconsequential to the true heart of the abortion debate.  Touting that statistic simply appeals to the same selfish impulses that would compel a woman to consider an abortion in the first place.  Now, that may save some pre-born lives now and in the immediate future, which is highly worthwhile, but it isn't really changing any hearts or minds on the abortion issue itself. 

The abortion/breast cancer connection is not a miracle fix.  It won't change the way our legislators vote.  It won't change the way the media cover things.  And it definitely won't influence future generations to stop slaughtering their unborn children -- they'll simply direct their resources toward finding a cure for breast cancer.  Curing breast cancer is a wonderful goal--but one that, once achieved, will make the abortion/breast cancer link a moot point.

Any possible link to breast cancer in post-abortive women has no bearing on the true argument against abortion, which is that it kills innocent life.  Some pro-lifers seem excited that we have a 'real scientific argument' now with this breast cancer debacle, when the truth is that we have had a real argument all along in the form of little heartbeats that once were, but are no more.

Our argument is lasting and unchanging--abortion kills.  The breast cancer argument is only usable for as long as the current studies last--which is only as long as it takes before some other pseudo-scientist releases a conflicting study 'disproving' the first studies. Just think of the headache-inducing reports on everything from coffee to hair dye that are staples of the nightly news.  One day, we learn that butter will surely kill us all; the next, it's margarine that is the villain.  On Tuesday, doctors say we should have a glass of wine nightly; by Thursday, they've changed their tune.  Depending on a statistical study as our moral ground in the abortion debate is foolhardy.

Pro-lifers must cease trying to legitimize our efforts through anything other than plain truth.  Our efforts are already legitimate, and need no justification—only persistence. Scare tactics and flimsy science do nothing to enhance the veracity of our cause.

Join Kirsten's Fan Club

  

Know anyone who might enjoy this site?
Please ... Let 'em Know!
  Full Name Email Address
You
Friend
Tell me how to add a referral form to my site.

Shop PUSA 


Modern Sex : Liberation and Its Discontents

by Myron Magnet (Editor)



The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially

by Linda J. Waite and Maggie Gallagher


Scan your PC for viruses now!

Magazine of the Month



Her Way: Young Women Remake the Sexual Revolution
by Paula Kamen


DVD's Under $10 at buy.com!

Cigar.com



The Rehnquist Choice: The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment That Redefined the Supreme Court

by John W. Dean


 Leather - Sale (30 to 50% off)

 Shop for Your Princess at DisneyStore.com


Search the Web for:
Death Penalty

Ronald Reagan

Middle East
MP3
Web Music
George W. Bush
Saddam Hussein

Online Gambling
Auto Loans

Free Online Games

NFL

Nascar

Britney Spears

Search the Web for:

© Kirsten Andersen, 2001, All rights reserved.


Home | PUSA Columnists | Talking Heads | Directories | News
Chat Boards | Links | Advertise | Submit | Contact | Shopping

©
PoliticalUSA.com, Inc., 1999-2001. Unauthorized use of materials is prohibited. If you want something, just ask us!
Views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Political USA.

 
 


ZoneSwap.com: The FREE Targeted Banner Exchange

Click Here!